The Godfather and Othello

So now that you've finished the first movie, what are your thoughts?  What is the manifestation of Evil that you see so far?  What are your thoughts on Michael?  How is he like/different from his father, The Don?  Also, please read Act I of Othello for Tuesday.  As you read, please post thoughts/questions on this great tragedy.  Have an Evil Labor Day!

The Restaurant Scene

I think the most effective part about the Restaurant scene was when Mikey was looking for the gun. It was presented like it wasn't planted there and it took him a while to find it, so watching it I thought maybe it wasn't there and his whole plan would be ruined! It was almost annoying that it took so long to play out. I understand the point but he probably spent five minutes in the bathroom, or at least it felt like it. Once he managed to find the gun, he took his sweet time actually pulling it out from behind the box, and then even more time fixing his hair before he walked out. It really got suspenseful when the train came flying by. The noise got louder and kept building and when it finally ended, Mikey decided to shoot everyone. Overall it was a great scene, just frustrating.

The Restaurant Scene- The Godfather

Probably the most effective part of the scene is illustrated in how there are no subtitles when the two men are speaking Italian. Coppola intentionally keeps the mystery, because he feels that the audience should pay more attention to the body language and hand gestures the two men make. It leaves the audience's imaginations to do the work, and they have to infer what is being said in this important meeting. After watching the scene the second time, I picked up on a few words that helped me get the basic idea of the conversation; however, I could not understand the whole thing. At this point my imagination was left to the translation. We also realize that Michael is not very comfortable speaking Italian. This shows the audience how, up until now, he has not been involved in the family "business". This scene in the restaurant is his first real hit, and it is also his sort of "induction" into the family. In this scene, Michael goes from being the little brother in the family to a respected, valuable member.

The Restaurant Scene

In my opinion, the most suspenseful moments were the ones where you were so sure in your mind you knew what was coming next because it is so self explanatory, but then you ended up being wrong. So instead of watching everything play out as planned, you were constantly debating in your mind how they were gonna go about it. For example, when Mikey went to the bathroom to find the gun, he starts to panic because he can't find it. In my head, Im thinking "Oh no, it's not there" and I quickly play through what I think the stories gonna turn out like in my head. However, moments later he finds it, and that makes me nervous because now I'm not sure what's coming next.

The Godfather

I found the restaurant scene to be very suspenseful. It made me so nervous because I was unsure if Mikey was going to go through with the plan and if everything was going to work out like it was planned. When they started to talk in Italian, it made me suspicious as to what they were saying, and that scene also helped build the suspense. It was interesting how unsure Mikey seemed about talking in Italian, but then again he was just about to commit a murder, so he was probably pretty nervous anyways. The part when Mikey went to the bathroom to get the gun was so nerve wrecking. At first I thought he wasn't able to find the gun, which made me even more nervous. The whole set up of the scene in a little town, in a deserted restaurant, also made the scene more suspenseful. However, Mikey did play the murder very cool and hasn't gotten caught...yet.

The Godfather

So, what do you think about the movie so far?  Any questions?  What do you like about it?  What is confusing?  How do you see it fitting in with any of our summer reading? 

Oscar Wilde and Dorian Gray

So, what do you think about the biography of Oscar Wilde?  Does it give you some insight into our novel?

Out of all three required summer reading books I read this summer, I enjoyed Grendel the most because of the thoughts he had and the progression of his “evil side”.  Grendel was also my favorite character, because out of all the characters I read about, Grendel was the only one I sympathized with. The Picture of Dorian Gray had the most “action”; therefore, it was my favorite plot.  The Screwtape Letters and Grendel had a less traditional plot and instead focused more on the development of a character or the development of evil.  In my opinion, Grendel had the best setting and atmosphere because of the eerie and whimsical nature of the book.  The portrait of Dorian Gray that changed the more evil Dorian became was the most developed and obvious symbol that illustrated the horrible effects of sin.  I found all of the books fascinating because in all of my readings at Woodward, none of them have really had the purpose of displaying evil.  I am not saying all of them have had happy endings, but I believe the ideas of a tragedy are different than the ideas of a book that is “evil”.  However, I did not care for The Screwtape Letters, because I never got into C.S. Lewis’ style and language.  Other than some of the profound language in The Screwtape Letters, the thing that confused me the most was the relevance of the dragon in Grendel.  The dragon was the only character that I did not understand fully.  When it comes to being “emotionally involved” with a book, I related to Grendel’s character the most.  His confusion about his identity, the uncertainty of why he does certain things and his struggle to understand his place in the world is relatable to my own life in ways.  I can sympathize with the struggle to find who you are as a person and where you belong in the cycle of things. 

The Dark Knight

The Dark Knight was amazing. Christopher Nolan is a genius. I am not sure how to discuss it without giving anything away :) therefore coach crook you need to go see it now so then we can discuss it!

Evil Movies

Thanks for your Evil Vents. Now, before we get to Othello, I  ask you to post or comment on movies you have seen lately that will relate to our class.  I am interested in the latest Dark Knight, which I have not seen.  So don't give things away!!! But you don't have to stick to The Dark Knight.  Thanks--CC

Summer Reading Vent

In my opinion, all of the summer reading books were relatively interesting, but if I

had to choose one, I would choose Dorian Gray. Maybe it’s because his story slightly

resembles a reversed Benjamin Button, or maybe it’s because a he was just a guy who

gave into temptation which most people can relate to. Also, I’m the kind of person

whose guilty pleasures consist of crime shows, lawyer shows, and more crime shows. So

even though he murdered Basil in the very ending part of the book, I kind of felt like

I knew all along that he was going to go crazy by using my television-given knowledge

of murders and crimes, and that kept me intrigued. Although most people saw Lord Henry

as good comic relief, my favorite character would have to be Basil. Basil is really my

kind of character because, even though Dorian treated him like an annoyance, you can

tell that from the moment Dorian changed until the moment Dorian stabbed him, Basil

wanted Dorian to get better. He saw that Dorian was going down a bad path and needed

help, whereas Lord Henry led him right to the welcome mat of the crazy shack. In my

opinion, everybody, no matter what kind of character, needs a friend like Basil.

Although he was a bit stubborn, he stuck to who he was, not who someone (Lord Henry)

made him believe he should be. For this reason, when Dorian killed Basil, someone who

would never turn his back on Dorian, it was clear to me that there was no hope for

Dorian to get better. All the lives that he ruined, or even ended, made me kind of

glad when he killed himself. As much as I would like to know what the book said, or

what the note said, I was really just satisfied that Dorian finally realized that even

though the painting kept him beautiful, it was a punishment. It kept him pretty, but

it made it so he could never escape his sins, but in fact, would be haunted by them.

In a normal world, a person makes a mistake and they get the advantage of learning

from it and moving on; however, Dorian chose to cheat the system, I

guess you could say, of growing old, so in return, he had to live with the memories of

every single sin until the day he died.

Summer Reading Vent

            I liked Picture of Dorian Gray, but it was my least favorite out of the three summer reading books and my book of choice.  The plot of was exciting and original.  I really like how dark the story gets, and how it probes questions about people and human nature.  As the story progresses it made me think about how immoral people can be.  Watching Lord Henry easily mold Dorian into a hedonist made me wonder whether or not people really want to “yield to their mind’s temptations.”  I also liked a lot of the dialog in the book, especially Lord Henry’s.  It is nice to hear such uncensored justification of selfishness, adultery, prejudice, and pleasure.  His rants were extremely engaging and sometimes they even sounded reasonable.  My main complaint about the book was the characters. I really did not like any of the characters.  Lord Henry was interesting at the beginning, but that was it.  Dorian should have been smart enough not to listen to Lord Henry’s nonsense about giving in to himself.  Then he drives Sybil to suicide, then ruins a bunch of peoples’ lives, and then kills Basil. Then there is Basil who should have stayed far away from the Dorian because he was clearly going to kill him in his house. 

            I was confused by some parts of the book.  The part where Henry convinces Dorian that Sybil’s Death was artistic did not make any sense to me.   I really do not understand how Dorian is comforted by the fact that her death was artistic. I also did not really understand Lord Henry’s rant about influence and why it is bad. 

            The Screw tape Letters was really interesting and thought provoking.  I like how hell is portrayed as a business or a bureaucracy of some sort.  I got a picture of the Screwtape sitting in his office and plotting the depravity of humans.  I like Screwtape as a character because he is sarcastic and has a funny view of the world.  I also like the Screwtape’s relationship with his nephew because it makes the story funnier and more relatable. 

            I thought that telling the story through letters between demons was fantastic.  The letters show a different view of the theological and moral points that C. S. Lewis.  Every time Screwtape writes a letter, he includes how the “Enemy” wants people to act in order to join him and then he describes how the demons  get humans to ignore his rules, break his rules, or make them think that they are following God’s rule while in reality they are sinning, bringing them closer to Hell.  It is hard to describe why, but for some reason the morality that Lewis and many other religious writers try to convey is much more influential coming from a demon.  Maybe it is because we are thinking about Screwtape’s goals while reading his letters to Wormwood and while I or read religious texts, I feel like I am reading a rule book.   

            Throughout the whole book, I felt really bad for The Patient because he was constantly tempted by Wormwood.  The thing that really stuck with me is how easy it is for humans to sin.  The Patient was a normal guy, and at the end of the book it almost felt as if he went to heaven because of a lucky chain of events.  I think the fact that he is normal and he does normal things helps get the message across because it makes explain the sin in everyday life.  Things like murder and theft do not really need to be explained.

            Grendel was my favorite book because I really like fantasy books like The Lord of the Ring and the Inheritance Cycle.  When we read Beowulf in ninth grade, I did not really feel good or bad about it.  It was interesting and fun to discuss in class but I had forgot about the story after I read it.  Grendel made was great because it gave Beowulf so much more depth.

            One of the things that I like about this book is the fact that it gave Grendel a personality.  The complex villains and their twisted incentives are the best part about comic book.  I think that is what was missing from Beowulf.  Old Grendel was basically an animal.  New Grendel has a fascinating past that explains why he goes to the Danish mead hall to terrorize them.  In some ways he is even a relatable character.  He is just trying to find a sense of purpose in the world.  I think he sees the animals in the wild and gets mad because he does not want to be like them; a brainless being that does the same thing every year.  The only person who gives him advice is the crazy dragon who tells him his only role in the world is to give the Danes value to their life.  I love the way he observes the humans before marauding and listening to his justifications and philosophy.  It reminded me of reading a super villain origin comic.

            There were two other things that I wanted to bring up with this book.  One was Hrothulf who was talking about overthrowing Hrothgar to Red Horse.  It just seemed out of place in the book.  Another is the way that Beowulf takes a back seat to Grendel in the story. In this book, Beowulf is only included in about ten pages and has a very small role in the whole book.

               Overall, I actually liked summer reading this year. I chose Mockingjay as my optional book. Even though you aren’t supposed to choose a book you have previously read, I did because I am a die-hard Hunger Games Trilogy fan. Naturally as a die–hard fan, I had already read the book, but I did re-read it for probably the 15^th time. I am excited for the discussion tomorrow mainly because I love just talking about the Hunger Games, and I know other fans are in my discussion group. Luckily with a series like the Hunger Games Trilogy, even though Mockingjay is by far the worst of the three, the discussion will still be amazing because of the background plot set by the first two books.  Overall I am just an obsessed Hunger Games fan, so it was great to jus tre-read the book. The first book of the mandatory summer reading books that I read was The Picture of Dorian Gray. Being the first summer reading book I picked up, reading it dragged on and on for me throughout the summer. I never really got into the story until Dorian becomes the vain, selfish person that he is when he dies.  The flaw in Dorian is his impressionability. Originally he starts off, as a sheltered, innocent, and especially attractive boy who basically has not experienced anything the world has to offer. Lord Henry manipulates him as early as their first interaction, but even then I was not interested in the book. The writing style that Oscar Wilde uses seemed to drag on and on for me. I can’t even tell you when I began to not mind reading it. Thinking back I think it was when Dorian’s character and morals had fully transformed, but that might just be my opinion after having read the entire book. Personally I did not think all the description of Dorian at parties with random people was necessary. The connection between people could have been established in less than half the pages that Oscar Wilde used, in my opinion. Next I read the Screwtape Letters. My mentality going into this book was horrible. I had heard from multiple people that it was the worst of the three books. I was dreading reading it, but after I realized what the book was about after the 2^nd or 3^rd chapter, I couldn’t put it down. I have a weird fascination with religious studies, not in the sense of studying the bible, but more like why people believe what they do. I loved “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” and almost everything we read in Ms. Ratliff’s class during the unit involving Puritanism. I knocked out Screwtape in a day, and I don’t think I have any problems with it. Initially I was confused as I am sure most people are about who was who. Because of the perspective, “the Enemy” is God, and I found that fascinating. Almost all of the human tendencies and traits that Screwtape described, I could relate to, either directly or indirectly, in my experiences with religion, and that fascinated me. I loved the book, and I loved how Sckrewtape analyzed the human behavior patterns. The idea of the subtle influence that the Devil’s helpers were using to influence the humans was a topic I have read about, and it was great to see that topic from a different perspective. After finishing Screwtape I started Grendel. I thought Grendel was okay, but I didn’t really enjoy Beowulf, and I didn’t really connect with Grendel either. I am glad I read Beowulf first though mainly because I view prequels as a type of reveal, and I enjoy that a lot. I understood the plot overall about Grendel’s transformation from a sheltered beast to one who terrifies humans. The dragon at first confused me, but then after getting further in the book I realized the significance. Overall for me it was just a book to finish for the test, I didn’t really enjoy it too much. It was just the typical summer reading book for me, and I also think that reading it after Screwtape was a let down.

Summer Reading Vent

My favorite book would have to be The Screwtape Letters. I enjoyed this book the most because I found every short chapter of the novel to be interesting. Every time that I ended a chapter, I was wanting to start the next one in order to find out about Wormwood’s success. Also, I loved that the book was written from the demon’s point of view and telling the reader the opposite of what one would normally hear. When I first started reading the book I remember being a little confused because Screwtape referred to God as the “Enemy”, which you usually don’t here. I loved how he called the devil “Our Father Below.” At times I found the book to be ironic because it was based on such an oddity being written from one of the demon’s stand point. I also found this book interesting because I knew that C.S. Lewis generally writes Christian novels, so this book took a different approach to that. While Screwtape was telling Wormwood what to do in order to get his victim away from Christianity, C.S. Lewis was simultaneously telling the reader what is “moral” in the Christian views. 

I also really enjoyed The Picture of Dorian Gray very much. What I enjoyed the most about it would probably be the dramatic personality change that is most apparent in Dorian Gray. The corruption of Dorian Gray into the man that Lord Henry ultimately dictates was very entertaining. Although his character changes very dramatically, this influence that Lord Henry had over Dorian is sometimes apparent in real life. Lord Henry had a way with words, which made him so appealing to Dorian. It is also interesting how Basil knows and sees the original, perfect Dorian Gray and is murdered trying to tell Dorian that he should repent for all of the horrific sins he has committed.   However, the ending would have to be the most interesting part. The irony of the ugly painting showing Dorian’s ugly soul is now portrayed on his dead body, which is now ugly and decrepit. 

Grendel was also an interesting novel because it showed the point of view of the monster that we all know and have read about in Beowulf. Throughout the whole novel, I have some sympathy for Grendel, which probably comes from seeing his mother and their relationship. Also, Grendel seems to have some pretty solid thoughts when he sees the corruption and disorder of man kind. From the beginning of the novel, we see how Grendel is constantly being mistreated my other animals as well as humans, which forces the reader to pity him. The ending of the book, although kind of expected, is still sad because Grendel’s convincing story has, after all, persuaded the reader to side with him against the humans. 

Summer Reading Vent

Grendel

For starters I couldn’t help but sympathize with Grendel. To put it best, he was really just misunderstood, which was made evident when he first encountered the warriors. In the beginning, his kills weren’t just for mere sport. They either came as a whim or to satiate his hunger. Even after his meeting with the dragon and he embraced his monstrous nature, he still showed a gentler side by sparring the queen. It was incredibly frustrating to read about a monster, who truly didn’t seek out to harm, give up simply because his words could not be understood by the warriors. Context wise, I didn’t quite understand what Grendel’s mother’s point was to being in the story. She was mute, and didn’t do much but lie around in their lair. Was the author only trying to prove how years of monstrous living could depreciate a soul in its entirety? And if so would that have been Grendel’s ultimate fate? It was a good read. It may have been a little slow in parts, but not so slow that I lost interest.

Mocking Jay

            Mocking Jay was definitely my least favorite of the series. In the first and second book the author builds you up to expect this grand finale. It comes, but it’s the majority of the book. Not to say that it wasn’t exciting, because it absolutely was. However it wasn’t the climax I would have expected from a teen, romance, drama. It all became incredibly depressing. Everyone you’d grown to love in the first two installments died, or worse, lived in misery. So I suppose in some ways it is what you would expect, rather it is what would rationally come from the siege of a corrupt society: death and despair. Unfortunately it’s not what I wanted. Peeta and Katniss did end up together, which is exactly what I was rooting for, however, Katniss could never fully heal from the Hunger Games and everything that resulted from it. All in all it was a lovely read. It just left me wanting a happier ending.

The Picture of Dorian Gray

            This book had me all over the place. In comes Dorian Gray, a charming, wealthy, beautiful young man that was utterly stripped of his purity. Lord Henry is the venomous bad guy that you just want to scream, “Shut up!” at, and naturally the author sets it up perfectly. You know something terrible is going to happen when Basil warns Dorian of Lord Henry. You know it’s going to be even worse when Dorian completely ignores the warning. Compare it to any bad scary movie that’s ever been made. There’s a suspicious noise in the background, and the helpless damsel goes to investigate. She slowly creeps open the closet, back tracks for the slightest of seconds, and out pops the stalker, waiting with a knife. All the audience, or in this case, reader can do is just sit helpless and watch as this idiot girl walks into her death. Well, that’s exactly what happened. Dorian walked straight in to Lord Henry’s trap, without even thinking twice about Basil’s warnings and all other obvious red flags. You think things might turn around when he gets engaged, but no. He emerges from it more terrible and self-serving than one could have ever expected. I think that the worst part was that he realized his mistake too late. Once he had truly wished to take it all back his death had already been laid out before him.

The Screwtape Letters          

                The patient goes to heaven! After all of that conversion that went on in the book I was so happy to find out that when the patient died, Wormwood hadn’t been successful in making him a meal. I learned a lot from this book, although it wasn’t my favorite I appreciated the interpretation had on religion. I noticed that by writing as the devil’s servant it made the message of God that much easier to understand. For example, Screwtape mentioned regularly how little thoughts and opinions mattered unless put into action. The action was key to sin. Say I don’t like someone at school. That does neither God nor the devil any good. If I were to vocalize those opinions, In C.S. Lewis’s eyes that rewards the devil and disappoints God. The action, if you will, is the defining factor that brings you either closer or farther away from God. It really frustrated me that the letters took so long. I felt like Lewis either dragged his point on, or took to long to get to it. But of course, that extra detail is what makes a story. You’d think though that being a “Senior Tempter” would require a certain amount of efficiency in relaying a message, but Screwtape delivered none whatsoever. I also found myself annoyed with Wormwood. I know he was learning, but he seemed to be truly incompetent. No matter what the cause laziness and negligence, as seen when the patient had his second conversion, just shouldn’t be excused! If your going to do something, I think you should be darn good at it!

WELCOME EVIL CLASS OF 2013!!

Let's get off to an Evil start by posting your Summer Reading Vents to our EVIL BLOG, as well as to TURNITIN.COM.  You may simply cut/paste the same post for both, or in your BLOG, you may expand your comments to follow up on a fellow EVIL STUDENT'S comment.  There is no wrong way to do this.  Just don't DISAPPOINTMENT me with not giving good effort or being on time or being insightful.

CC